The challenges of assessing patients' medication beliefs: a qualitative study

THORNELOE, Rachael J., GRIFFITHS, Christopher E.M., ASHCROFT, Darren M. and CORDINGLEY, Lis (2017). The challenges of assessing patients' medication beliefs: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 17 (1).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Thorneloe BMC Health Serv Res.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (419kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/article...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2020-y
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Background An estimated 50% of patients do not take their medication as prescribed, with medication adherence associated with adverse outcomes and higher costs of care. The Necessity-Concerns Framework identified individual’s beliefs about their medication as playing a key role in adherence, and UK Clinical Adherence Guidelines recommend eliciting and incorporating individual’s perceptions of their medication within the consultation. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) is widely used to assess medication beliefs, however, given the condition-specific nature of some self-management regimens, it is unknown whether this tool is able to fully capture beliefs about more complex medication regimens. Methods We examined the challenges of assessing medication beliefs using the BMQ in 20 people with a complex relapsing-remitting condition recruited from community sources. Data were collected from people with psoriasis; a patient group characterised by complex medication regimens, which include therapies that are applied topically, phototherapy/photochemotherapy, and therapies that are administered orally or via subcutaneous or intravenous injections. Semi-structured cognitive interviews were undertaken, with responses coded using established schedules and analysed using Content analysis. Results Individual’s beliefs about their condition specific therapies were not accurately captured by the BMQ. Medication beliefs as expressed during ‘real-time’ completion of the BMQ were underestimated, or failed to be captured, by the corresponding scores given by participants. There was mismatch between the terminology used in the scale and individuals perceptions of their condition and the complexity of its management and treatment outcomes. Currently the BMQ cannot represent beliefs about medicines underuse, even though some individuals with psoriasis viewed access to therapies as overly restrictive. Some the BMQ items were misinterpreted in part due to ambiguous item wording or due to misreading by participants. Conclusions This is the first study to identify general and condition-specific difficulties experienced by individuals completing the BMQ in ‘real time’. The main implication of this research is the need to develop condition-specific versions of the BMQ in order that this important instrument can capture the full range of medication beliefs in individuals living with a complex relapsing-remitting condition. Access to condition-specific versions could significantly increase our understanding of beliefs which facilitate or reduce medication adherence.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Health Policy & Services; 1117 Public Health and Health Services; 0807 Library and Information Studies
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2020-y
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 17 Dec 2019 16:00
    Last Modified: 17 Dec 2019 16:00
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24452

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics