KOYA, Kushwanth and CHOWDHURY, Gobinda (2017). Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise. PLOS ONE, 12 (12), e0190337.
|
PDF
Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise.pdf - Published Version Creative Commons Attribution. Download (328kB) | Preview |
Official URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.13...
Open Access URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=...
(Published)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190337
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179722.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | MD Multidisciplinary; General Science & Technology |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190337 |
Page Range: | e0190337 |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic Elements |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Elements |
Date Deposited: | 27 Feb 2019 10:32 |
Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2021 06:33 |
URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/23542 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year