Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise

KOYA, Kushwanth and CHOWDHURY, Gobinda (2017). Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise. PLOS ONE, 12 (12), e0190337.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (328kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.13...
Open Access URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=... (Published)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190337
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179722.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: MD Multidisciplinary; General Science & Technology
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190337
    Page Range: e0190337
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2019 10:32
    Last Modified: 27 Feb 2019 10:32
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/23542

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics