Assessing the information and support needs of radical prostate cancer patients and acceptability of a group-based treatment review: a questionnaire and qualitative interview study

CHAUHAN, Munisha, HOLCH, Patricia and HOLBORN, Catherine (2018). Assessing the information and support needs of radical prostate cancer patients and acceptability of a group-based treatment review: a questionnaire and qualitative interview study. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 17 (2), 151-161.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Holborn-AssessingInfomtionAndSupportNeedsRadicalProstate(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
All rights reserved.

Download (504kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396917000644
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Aims: Current literature suggests the information and support needs of oncology patients undergoing radical radiotherapy to the prostate often remain unmet and can impact quality of life. We aimed to explore the effectiveness of delivery and opportunities for service improvement, including a group-based treatment review. Methods: A total of 60 prostate patients completing radical radiotherapy (mean age 70, range 47–79) in a UK cancer-centre completed a self-designed questionnaire assessing information and support. To explore views on a group-based treatment review, 11% took part in a semi-structured interview. Descriptive data were computed and interviews transcribed and analysed thematically. Results: In all, 87% were satisfied with information and support when delivered by radiographers. However, 26% were only ‘sometimes’ able to complete bladder-filling, suggesting information regarding treatment delays would improve this. In total, 49% preferred both Doctor and Urology nurse reviews whereas 26% preferred nurse only; 70% stated their ‘concerns were always addressed’ by a nurse and 49% by a Doctor. Interviews revealed that a group review was generally acceptable with peer support an influencing factor. Findings: Overall patients felt their needs were being met. Suggestions for improvement (more information on preparation, side effects and delays) will be implemented locally. Future work will explore the feasibility of group reviews in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy to the prostate.

    Item Type: Article
    Departments - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Health and Well-being > Department of Allied Health Professions
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396917000644
    Page Range: 151-161
    Depositing User: Carmel House
    Date Deposited: 21 Feb 2018 16:38
    Last Modified: 16 Nov 2018 14:01
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/18679

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics