Measures of upper limb function for people with neck pain. A systematic review of measurement and practical properties

ALRENI, Ahmad Salah Eldin, HARROP, Deborah, LOWE, Anna, POTIA, Tanzila, KILNER, Karen and MCLEAN, Sionnadh Mairi (2017). Measures of upper limb function for people with neck pain. A systematic review of measurement and practical properties. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 29, 155-163.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Post print manuscript)
Manuscript Final Version (Clean Copy Post Correction) .pdf - Accepted Version
All rights reserved.

Download (438kB) | Preview
[img] PDF (Acceptance email)
Acecptance email.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (254kB) | Contact the author
Official URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.02.004
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    There is a strong relationship between neck pain (NP) and upper limb disability (ULD). Optimal management of NP should incorporate upper limb rehabilitation and therefore include the use of an ULD measure in the assessment and management process. Clear guidance regarding the suitability of available measures does not exist. The aim of this study was to identify all available measures of ULD for populations with NP, critically evaluate their measurement properties and finally recommend a list of suitable measures. This two-phase systematic review is reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Phase one identified clearly reproducible measures of ULD for patients with NP. Phase two identified evidence of their measurement properties. In total, 11 papers evaluating the measurement properties of five instruments were included in this review. The instruments identified were the DASH questionnaire, the QuickDASH questionnaire, the NULI questionnaire, the SFA and the SAMP test. There was limited positive evidence of validity of the DASH, QuickDASH, NULI, SFA and SAMP. There was limited positive evidence of reliability of the NULI, SFA and SAMP. There was unknown evidence of responsiveness of the DASH and QuickDASH. Although all measures are supported by a limited amount of low quality evidence, the DASH, QuickDASH, NULI questionnaires, and the SAMP test are promising measures, but they require further robust evaluation.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Upper limb function; Disability; Neck pain; Outcome measures; Quality; Psychometric properties
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Centre for Health and Social Care Research
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.02.004
    Page Range: 155-163
    Depositing User: Deborah Harrop
    Date Deposited: 27 Mar 2017 13:08
    Last Modified: 24 Jul 2018 20:26
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/15442

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics