Anaphoric Islands and Anaphoric Forms: The Role of Explicit and Implicit Focus

GARNHAM, Alan, OAKHILL, Jane and REYNOLDS, David (2017). Anaphoric Islands and Anaphoric Forms: The Role of Explicit and Implicit Focus. Discourse Processes, 1-9. (In Press)

[img] PDF
Reynolds -anaphoric islands and anaphoric forms.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 12 January 2019.
Available under License All rights reserved.

Download (453kB) | Contact the author
Official URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853...
Link to published version:: 10.1080/0163853x.2017.1330033

Abstract

Two experiments are reported in which people resolve references to sets of entities (e.g. lies) that have previously been introduced either explicitly into a text (“the lies”) or implicitly via a cognate verb (a form of the verb “to lie”). Pronominal references to such entities were judged as relatively unacceptable, and required longer judgement times when judgements were positive, compared to cases in which the antecedent was explicit. This finding suggests that the inference from the activity of lying to a set of lies is made in the backwards direction (Garnham & Oakhill, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 719-735) . Results with full noun phrase anaphors show a different pattern, with no penalty in either times or acceptability judgements for the implicit case. The results are discussed in terms of Sanford and Garrod’s (1981, Understanding written language) hypotheses about reference processing and the notion of the centrality of an antecedent in a scenario.

Item Type: Article
Research Institute, Centre or Group: Psychology Research Group
Identification Number: 10.1080/0163853x.2017.1330033
Depositing User: David Reynolds
Date Deposited: 10 Mar 2017 12:09
Last Modified: 09 Aug 2017 19:16
URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14852

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics