Effect of cadence on locomotor–respiratory coupling during upper-body exercise

TILLER, Nicholas, PRICE, Mike J., CAMPBELL, Ian G. and ROMER, Lee M. (2017). Effect of cadence on locomotor–respiratory coupling during upper-body exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 117 (2), 279-287.

Tiller Effect of cadence on locomotor–respiratory coupling.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (668kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-01...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3517-5


Introduction: Asynchronous arm-cranking performed at high cadences elicits greater cardiorespiratory responses compared to low cadences. This has been attributed to increased postural demand and locomotor–respiratory coupling (LRC), and yet, this has not been empirically tested. This study aimed to assess the effects of cadence on cardiorespiratory responses and LRC during upper-body exercise. Methods: Eight recreationally-active men performed arm-cranking exercise at moderate and severe intensities that were separated by 10 min of rest. At each intensity, participants exercised for 4 min at each of three cadences (50, 70, and 90 rev min−1) in a random order, with 4 min rest-periods applied in-between cadences. Exercise measures included LRC via whole- and half-integer ratios, cardiorespiratory function, perceptions of effort (RPE and dyspnoea), and diaphragm EMG using an oesophageal catheter. Results: The prevalence of LRC during moderate exercise was highest at 70 vs. 50 rev min−1 (27 ± 10 vs. 13 ± 9%, p = 0.000) and during severe exercise at 90 vs. 50 rev min−1 (24 ± 7 vs. 18 ± 5%, p = 0.034), with a shorter inspiratory time and higher mean inspiratory flow (p < 0.05) at higher cadences. During moderate exercise, (Formula presented.) and fC were higher at 90 rev min−1 (p < 0.05) relative to 70 and 50 rev min−1 ((Formula presented.) 1.19 ± 0.25 vs. 1.05 ± 0.21 vs. 0.97 ± 0.24 L min−1; fC 116 ± 11 vs. 101 ± 13 vs. 101 ± 12 b min−1), with concomitantly elevated dyspnoea. There were no discernible cadence-mediated effects on diaphragm EMG. Conclusion: Participants engage in LRC to a greater extent at moderate-high cadences which, in turn, increase respiratory airflow. Cadence rate should be carefully considered when designing aerobic training programmes involving the upper-limbs.

Item Type: Article
Departments - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Health and Well-being > Department of Sport
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3517-5
Page Range: 279-287
Depositing User: Margaret Boot
Date Deposited: 13 Jan 2017 10:19
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 04:18
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14609

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics