ImPACT: a multifaceted implementation for conversation partner training in aphasia in Dutch rehabilitation settings.

WIELAERT, Sandra, AN DE SANDT-KOENDERMAN, Mieke W.M.E., DAMMERS, Nina and SAGE, Karen (2016). ImPACT: a multifaceted implementation for conversation partner training in aphasia in Dutch rehabilitation settings. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40 (1), 76-89.

[img]
Preview
PDF (12 month embargo required)
Wielaert_et al_ImPACT accepted version 14-2-2016.pdf - Published Version
All rights reserved.

Download (733kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/096382...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1243160
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Purpose: Exploration of the clinical uptake of a novel conversation partner training (CPT) programme in aphasia in ten Dutch rehabilitation facilities and identification of its perceived facilitators and barriers in service providers, and the evaluation of the implementation methods used. Method: Ten rehabilitation centres took part in a multifaceted implementation of conversation partner training over thirteen months. Each centre selected two speech and language therapists to act as knowledge brokers whose role it was to raise awareness of CPT in the team and to facilitate getting partners of people with aphasia into the programme. The implementation was evaluated using analysis of recruitment data and questionnaires, supplemented by consensus data and scrutiny of implementation plans. Results: Successful implementation was described as 1) four dyads included during the intervention period, 2) two more dyads included after the intervention period, before the end of the study and 3) inclusion of Partners of Aphasic Clients Conversation Training (PACT) in a description of the logistics of local stroke care (stroke care pathway). Seven centres were successful in reaching the target inclusion of 6 dyads in total. Only one centre had care pathways in place. From a recruitment pool of 504 dyads, 41 dyads were recruited and 34 partners completed the implementation of PACT study (ImPACT). Observed facilitators included the motivation to engage partners in the rehabilitation process and the perceived added value of PACT. The perceived barriers focused on time limitations within current systems to discuss the consequences of PACT with relevant professionals and to establish allocated time for PACT within existing care routines. Conclusions: The motivation of professionals to involve partners in the rehabilitation process assisted with the introduction of PACT in practice. The main barrier was time, linked to the requirement to think through integration of this innovation within existing care. Longer term evaluation would ascertain how centres sustain uptake without support.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Centre for Health and Social Care Research
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1243160
    Page Range: 76-89
    Depositing User: Karen Sage
    Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2016 17:14
    Last Modified: 08 Jul 2019 18:15
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13590

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics