Too entrenched to be challenged? A commentary on the rule against contractual penalties post Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis

NICHOLSON, Alex (2016). Too entrenched to be challenged? A commentary on the rule against contractual penalties post Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22 (3).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Nicholson Too entrenched to be challenged.pdf - Published Version
All rights reserved.

Download (404kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://webjcli.org/article/view/498/670
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    In the recent conjoined appeals of Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis, the Supreme Court declined to abolish English law's highly controversial rule against contractual penalties, choosing instead merely to reformulate the test. This commentary examines the new test and asks whether the rule's critics should now accept defeat.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Law and Criminology Research Group
    Depositing User: Alex Nicholson
    Date Deposited: 05 Sep 2016 12:40
    Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 04:09
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13337

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics