Too entrenched to be challenged? A commentary on the rule against contractual penalties post Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis

NICHOLSON, Alex (2016). Too entrenched to be challenged? A commentary on the rule against contractual penalties post Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22 (3).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Nicholson Too entrenched to be challenged.pdf - Published Version
Available under License All rights reserved.

Download (404kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://webjcli.org/article/view/498/670

Abstract

In the recent conjoined appeals of Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis, the Supreme Court declined to abolish English law's highly controversial rule against contractual penalties, choosing instead merely to reformulate the test. This commentary examines the new test and asks whether the rule's critics should now accept defeat.

Item Type: Article
Research Institute, Centre or Group: Law and Criminology Research Group
Depositing User: Alex Nicholson
Date Deposited: 05 Sep 2016 12:40
Last Modified: 02 Nov 2016 22:23
URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13337

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics