NICHOLSON, Alexander (2016). Too entrenched to be challenged? A commentary on the rule against contractual penalties post Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22 (3).
Nicholson Too entrenched to be challenged.pdf - Published Version
Available under License All rights reserved.
Download (404kB) | Preview
In the recent conjoined appeals of Cavendish v Makdessi and ParkingEye v Beavis, the Supreme Court declined to abolish English law's highly controversial rule against contractual penalties, choosing instead merely to reformulate the test. This commentary examines the new test and asks whether the rule's critics should now accept defeat.
|Research Institute, Centre or Group:||Law and Criminology Research Group|
|Depositing User:||Alex Nicholson|
|Date Deposited:||05 Sep 2016 12:40|
|Last Modified:||19 Oct 2016 17:06|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year