Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of the interdisciplinary management tool: a reflective tool to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork using structured, facilitated action research for implementation

NANCARROW, Susan, SMITH, Tony, ARISS, Steven and ENDERBY, Pamela M. (2015). Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of the interdisciplinary management tool: a reflective tool to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork using structured, facilitated action research for implementation. Health & Social Care In The Community, 23 (4), 437-448.

[img] PDF (Acceptance e-mail)
Smith - 12791.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (48kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF
Nancrow and smith - Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of - Manuscript HSCC Final SURA (2).pdf - Accepted Version
All rights reserved.

Download (229kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hsc.121...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12173
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Reflective practice is used increasingly to enhance team functioning and service effectiveness; however, there is little evidence of its use in interdisciplinary teams. This paper presents the qualitative evaluation of the Interdisciplinary Management Tool (IMT), an evidence-based change tool designed to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork through structured team reflection. The IMT incorporates three components: an evidence-based resource guide; a reflective implementation framework based on Structured, Facilitated Action Research for Implementation methodology; and formative and summative evaluation components. The IMT was implemented with intermediate care teams supported by independent facilitators in England. Each intervention lasted 6 months and was evaluated over a 12-month period. Data sources include interviews, a focus group with facilitators, questionnaires completed by team members and documentary feedback from structured team reports. Data were analysed qualitatively using the Framework approach. The IMT was implemented with 10 teams, including 253 staff from more than 10 different disciplines. Team challenges included lack of clear vision; communication issues; limited career progression opportunities; inefficient resource use; need for role clarity and service development. The IMT successfully engaged staff in the change process, and resulted in teams developing creative strategies to address the issues identified. Participants valued dedicated time to focus on the processes of team functioning; however, some were uncomfortable with a focus on teamwork at the expense of delivering direct patient care. The IMT is a relatively low-cost, structured, reflective way to enhance team function. It empowers individuals to understand and value their own, and others' roles and responsibilities within the team; identify barriers to effective teamwork, and develop and implement appropriate solutions to these. To be successful, teams need protected time to take for reflection, and executive support to be able to broker changes that are beyond the scope of the team.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Centre for Health and Social Care Research
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12173
    Page Range: 437-448
    Depositing User: Margaret Boot
    Date Deposited: 22 Jul 2016 10:39
    Last Modified: 28 Mar 2020 15:35
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/12791

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics