FOTIOS, Steve and CASTLETON, Holly (2016). Specifying enough light to feel reassured on pedestrian footpaths. Leukos: The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. (In Press)
__staffhome.hallam.shu.ac.uk_STAFFHOME2_2_aceshc2_MyWork_RESEARCH_Fotios Castleton 2016 reassurance research methods ONLINE VERSION.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (569kB) | Preview
This article discusses lighting for pedestrians and how investigation of reassurance might lead toward an understanding of the right amount of light. A conventional approach is to evaluate reassurance after dark under road lighting of different illuminance: this tends to show the trivial result that higher illuminances enhance reassurance, and that alone does not enable an optimum light level to be identified. One reason is that the category rating procedure widely used is prone to stimulus range bias; experimental results are presented that demonstrate stimulus range bias in reassurance evaluations. This article also recommends alternative methods for future research. One such method is the day–dark rating approach, which does not tend toward ever higher illuminances, and results are presented of two studies using this method.
|Research Institute, Centre or Group:||Materials and Engineering Research Institute > Engineering Research|
|Depositing User:||Holly Castleton|
|Date Deposited:||20 Jul 2016 15:24|
|Last Modified:||20 Oct 2016 00:30|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year