Comparing verification techniques for model transformations

LANO, K, KOLAHDOUZ-RAHIMI, S and CLARK, Tony (2012). Comparing verification techniques for model transformations. In: MoDeVVa '12 Proceedings of the Workshop on Model-Driven Engineering, Verification and Validation. ACM, 23-28.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2427381
Link to published version:: 10.1145/2427376.2427381

Abstract

Model transformations are a central element of model-driven development (MDD) approaches. The correctness of model transformations is critical to their effective use in practical software development, since users must be able to rely upon transformations correctly preserving the semantics of source models and producing valid target models. In this paper we provide techniques for proving the termination, confluence and correctness of declaratively-specified model transformations, relative to a formal semantics for UML and OCL. We compare the effectiveness of syntactic analysis techniques, interactive verification tools and automated proof tools.

Item Type: Book Section
Research Institute, Centre or Group: Cultural Communication and Computing Research Institute > Communication and Computing Research Centre
Identification Number: 10.1145/2427376.2427381
Depositing User: Tony Clark
Date Deposited: 20 Apr 2016 11:02
Last Modified: 09 Nov 2016 17:08
URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/12021

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics