SALWAY, Sarah, CHOWBEY, Punita, SUCH, Elizabeth and FERGUSON, Beverly (2015). Researching health inequalities with Community Researchers : practical, methodological and ethical challenges of an ‘inclusive’ research approach. Research Involvement and Engagement, 1 (9).
Chowbey Researching health inequalities with Community Researchers.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (493kB) | Preview
Background: Inclusive research approaches are increasingly employed by public health researchers. Recent methodological development includes the engagement of Community Researchers (CRs), who use their knowledge and networks to facilitate research with the community with which they identify. Few studies have explored the experiences of CRs in the research process, an important element of any comprehensive assessment of the pros and cons of such research endeavours. We report here on the experiences of CRs engaged in a study of health inequalities and poverty in ethnically diverse and disadvantaged areas of London, UK. Methods: We draw on the experiences of 12 CRs. Two sets of data were generated, analysed and integrated: debriefing/active reflection exercises throughout the 18-month research process and individual qualitative interviews with CRs, conducted at the end of the project (n = 9). Data were organised using NVivo10 and coded line-by-line using a framework developed iteratively. Synthesis and interpretation were achieved through a series of reflective team exercises involving input from 4 of the CRs. Final consolidation of key themes was conducted by SS and ES. Results: Being an ‘insider’ to the communities brought distinct advantages to the research process but also generated complexities. CRs highlighted how ‘something would be lost’ without their involvement but still faced challenges in gathering and analysing data. Some CRs found it difficult to practice reflexivity, and problems of ethnic stereotyping were revealed. Conflict between roles as community members and investigators was at times problematic. The approach promoted some aspects of personal empowerment, but CRs were frustrated by the limited impact of the research at the local level. Conclusions: Working with CRs offers distinct practical, ethical and methodological advantages to public health researchers, but these are limited by a range of challenges related to ‘closeness’, orthodox research structures and practices and the complexities of dynamic identities. For research of this type to meet its full potential and avoid harm,there is a need for careful support to CRs and long-term engagement between funders, research institutions and communities.
|Research Institute, Centre or Group:||Centre for Health and Social Care Research|
|Depositing User:||Punita Chowbey|
|Date Deposited:||10 Dec 2015 11:20|
|Last Modified:||19 Oct 2016 23:08|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year