‘Coordination’ (Herbert H Clark), ‘integration’ (Roy Harris) and the foundations of communication theory: common ground or competing visions?

JONES, Peter E (2015). ‘Coordination’ (Herbert H Clark), ‘integration’ (Roy Harris) and the foundations of communication theory: common ground or competing visions? Language Sciences, 53 (Part A), 31-43.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Jones - 'Coordination' (Herb Clark) and 'integration' (Roy Harris) Revised final.pdf - Accepted Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (501kB) | Preview
[img] PDF (Acceptance e-mail)
Jones - 10476.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (98kB)
Official URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.07.001
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    The paper explores the relationship between Herbert H Clark’s conception of language use as ‘coordination’ in joint action and Roy Harris’s view of sign-making as an ‘integration’ of activities.

    On the face of it, the two approaches have much in common. Both Clark and Harris have raised fundamental objections to traditional linguistic approaches: Clark has counterposed an 'action tradition' to a prevailing 'product tradition', while Harris has proposed an 'integrational' view in opposition to a prevailing 'segregational' approach, both scholars insisting on seeing the production and interpretation of signs as embedded in contexts of activity. However, clear differences between the two approaches revolve around their respective attitudes to common ground in joint action and to the existence of languages as conventionally theorised. The paper explores these differences in relation to the role of intention and shared knowledge in meaning-making and to the status of conventional meaning in linguistic communication. The paper argues that Clark's approach overall ultimately proves vulnerable to Harris's critique of the reifying tendencies and ideology of the western language tradition and ends with a brief reflection on the wider socio-political implications of debates over linguistic methodology.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Humanities Research Centre
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.07.001
    Page Range: 31-43
    Depositing User: Peter Jones
    Date Deposited: 25 Jun 2015 13:07
    Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 04:58
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/10476

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics