‘Coordination’ (Herbert H Clark), ‘integration’ (Roy Harris) and the foundations of communication theory: common ground or competing visions?

JONES, Peter E (2015). ‘Coordination’ (Herbert H Clark), ‘integration’ (Roy Harris) and the foundations of communication theory: common ground or competing visions? Language Sciences, 53 (Part A), 31-43.

[img] PDF
Jones - 'Coordination' (Herb Clark) and 'integration' (Roy Harris) Revised final.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 January 2017.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (501kB)
[img] PDF (Acceptance e-mail)
Jones - 10476.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (98kB)
Official URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...
Link to published version:: 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.07.001


The paper explores the relationship between Herbert H Clark’s conception of language use as ‘coordination’ in joint action and Roy Harris’s view of sign-making as an ‘integration’ of activities.

On the face of it, the two approaches have much in common. Both Clark and Harris have raised fundamental objections to traditional linguistic approaches: Clark has counterposed an 'action tradition' to a prevailing 'product tradition', while Harris has proposed an 'integrational' view in opposition to a prevailing 'segregational' approach, both scholars insisting on seeing the production and interpretation of signs as embedded in contexts of activity. However, clear differences between the two approaches revolve around their respective attitudes to common ground in joint action and to the existence of languages as conventionally theorised. The paper explores these differences in relation to the role of intention and shared knowledge in meaning-making and to the status of conventional meaning in linguistic communication. The paper argues that Clark's approach overall ultimately proves vulnerable to Harris's critique of the reifying tendencies and ideology of the western language tradition and ends with a brief reflection on the wider socio-political implications of debates over linguistic methodology.

Item Type: Article
Research Institute, Centre or Group: Humanities Research Centre
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.07.001
Depositing User: Peter Jones
Date Deposited: 25 Jun 2015 13:07
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2016 21:49
URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/10476

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics