Stress among UK academics : identifying who copes best?

DARABI, Mitra, MACASKILL, Ann and REIDY, Lisa (2016). Stress among UK academics : identifying who copes best? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41 (3), 393-412.

darabi,_macaskill,_reidy_-_Stress_in_Academics_last_version_.pdf - Accepted Version
All rights reserved.

Download (545kB) | Preview
Link to published version::
Related URLs:


    This paper examined the levels of stress and coping strategies among UK academics. Adopting a positive psychology approach, the influence of the character strengths of hope, optimism, gratitude and self-efficacy, on stress, subjective well-being (SWB), and mental health (GHQ) was examined in 216 academics in a UK university. The study explored the relationship between coping styles and work-coping variables of sense of coherence and work locus of control and stress. No significant differences on the stress, well-being and mental health measures were found for participants' gender, whether in full-time or part-time employment and level of seniority within the university. Participants using problem-focussed coping experienced lower levels of stress while dysfunctional coping was a positive predictor of stress. Hope agency, hope pathway, gratitude, optimism and self-efficacy were the strongest positive predictors of satisfaction with life (SWL), while levels of perceived stress negatively predicted SWL. Gratitude, hope agency and self-efficacy positively predicted positive affect, while stress was a negative predictor. Gratitude, hope agency, self-efficacy and optimism were negative significant predictors of negative affect while stress was a positive predictor. Gratitude positively predicted mental health, while stress was a negative predictor and optimism was a significant moderator of the relationship between stress and mental health. Academics with higher levels of gratitude, self-efficacy, hope and optimism report lower levels of stress at work and higher levels of well-being as measured by higher life satisfaction, higher positive affect and lower negative affect. New approaches to stress management training are suggested based on these findings.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Psychology Research Group
    Identification Number:
    Page Range: 393-412
    Depositing User: Ann Macaskill
    Date Deposited: 18 Jun 2015 10:29
    Last Modified: 16 Nov 2018 12:45

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item


    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics