Tools
Tools
DAYSON, Christopher, FRASER, Alec and LOWE, Toby (2019). A comparative analysis of Social Impact Bond and conventional financing approaches to health service commissioning in England: the case of social prescribing. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis.
|
PDF
Dayson_AComparativeAnalysis(VoR).pdf - Published Version Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (609kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The article compares two social prescribing interventions in Northern England. One was financed through a Social Impact Bond (SIB) and the other was financed in a more conventional way. It utilises a comparative approach to understand the extent to which different methods of financing social prescribing conform to key features of the New Public Management (NPM) or New Public Governance (NPG) in their design and implementation. It finds that a SIB approach tends towards NPM during programme design and implementation and that this creates challenges for social prescribing programmes, the complexity of which appear better suited to an NPG-based relational approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1605 Policy and Administration; 1606 Political Science |
| Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1643614 |
| SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic Elements |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Elements |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Jul 2019 13:23 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2021 03:07 |
| URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24863 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year