MADRIAGA, M. (2010). Why US nationalism should never be considered postnationalist. National identities, 12 (1), 81-94.
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
This article demonstrates that American national identity is symbolic, subjective and ambiguous to the extent that it encapsulates senses of both similarity and difference. Citing evidence from life-history interviews with American military veterans from different ethnic groups, the article shows how some Americans can identify with being racially excluded and still share in a sense of national belonging. It is argued here that this feature is and has always been embedded in the processes of American national identification. In making this argument, this article rejects Ramsey Cook's notion that achieving a sense of similarity between universal and particular interests within a national community is hallmark of postnationalism.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | American nationalism, ethnicity, nationalism, postnationalism, whiteness |
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: | Learning and Teaching Institute Sociology, Politics and Policy Research Group |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/14608940903542672 |
Page Range: | 81-94 |
Depositing User: | Caroline Fixter |
Date Deposited: | 18 Mar 2010 16:28 |
Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2021 10:15 |
URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1316 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year