Copyright (c) 2009 Sheffield Hallam University All rights reserved. http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session8/track_b Recent Events in Methodology en-us Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:28:37 PDT 3600 http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session8/track_b/3 http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session8/track_b/3 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:30:00 PDT Future adaptations in vehicle design should be linked in some parts to the age-related changes often faced by the older users. The aim of this research is to investigate the multiple age-related changes of Chinese older vehicle users in order to assist designers to better understand current and future older users' needs. Although qualitative interpretative approaches have rarely been applied in the field of traffic gerontology research, they are widely used in current design research to explore persons' lived experiences, behaviours and emotions. Therefore, this study employed qualitative research methods consisting of observation, interview, travel logbook and co-discovery to explore older vehicle users' travel needs. The interpretative analysis confirmed that multiple methods such as interview, travel logbook, and co-discovery are useful to gain a holistic understanding of older drivers' travel needs. However, the one journey driving observation cannot provide valuable categories to explore older users' multiple travel needs due to daily living context absence in the one trip experiment. It is clear that the useful methods for determining research for older users will depend on the product. The findings demonstrate that Chinese future older generations are more concerned about their age-related differences from social and cultural perspective rather than physiological perspective. Social and cultural context play important role to shape older vehicle users' future travel needs. From design a point of view, understanding the social activity and cultural context surrounds older vehicle users should make it possible to predict older drivers' needs related to vehicle property. Keywords: Older Vehicle Users; Cultural Context; Social Context; Vehicle Design; Qualitative Research Chao Zhao http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session8/track_b/2 http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session8/track_b/2 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:00:00 PDT The paper suggests an interpretative approach to the empirical study of design processes. Design processes are conceived as social processes of interpretation and construction of meaning, and potentially of context generation. In contrast to models which conceive designing as a goal-directed process, an interpretative approach suggests a methodological reorientation. It assumes that design goals are more or less incomplete and vague at the beginning of a design process and are interpreted in contexts and in part are created by designers in the design process on the basis of their experience, embodied skills, and practices. The interpretative paradigm in design research seeks to observe, investigate, and describe practices that designers use in the process. Rather than attempting to determine and prescribe how practitioners ought to do their work, the research question is on how work is actually done - how interpretation is achieved by designers in particular design processes. An extract is analysed in some detail in the paper. These data are taken from the transcript of a case study of a design process in practice. Sociological and socio-linguistic ('sensitizing') concepts such as frames and contexts are adopted to describe and analyze some practices observed in the episodes. The paper focuses on an aspect of designing - various forms of involvement and stances designers' take on in the meaning making process of interpretative design work. Interpretative analysis takes into account designers' alignments which constitute "participation frameworks" and ground designers' multimodal practices in different media (language, drawing, gesture). Goffman's (1981) concept of "footing" is used to reveal more subtle shifts in stances that designers take in designing. Investigation of referential practices designers use in some utterances in the observed design conversation suggests that designers step into, displace, and position themselves in transformed, "keyed" situations to experience the solicitations of design situations more directly and to take the role of others as well as the role of objects. These practices appear to be part of designers' ability to construct meaning by establishing perspectives and getting "maximal grip" on design situations so as to exert their skills. Analysis of types of stances designers take in an observed design process, some of which addressed in the paper, may provide a way to describe an aspect of designers' artistry and to characterize the particularities of unique design processes. The suggested approach is intended to contribute to a better theoretical understanding of designing and to the methodology of design research as an 'epistemology of practice'. Interpretative analysis also aims to provide description of designers' practices which may, as its practical benefits, contribute to 'the reflective turn' in design research. Keywords: Design Research Methodology; Design Practices; Framing; Case Study Friedrich Glock http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session8/track_b/1 http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session8/track_b/1 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:30:00 PDT This paper distinguishes between three views of argument: "argument as structure," "argument as confrontation" and "argument as dialogical encounter." Empirical studies of the criteria that examiners bring to the assessment of PhDs are cited. The studies provide evidence that qualities that align one or other of the three modes of argument figure significantly in the criteria that examiners bring to the assessment process. Embedded in the studies are respondents' comments that suggest that the range of conceptions of argument held by PhD examiners is broad. Explicit use of the term "argument" is often made in reference to a minimal concept of argument ¬- "argument as structure." However, the reported comments indicate a significant bias towards qualities associated with concepts of argument that lie somewhere along the spectrum between "argument as confrontation" and "argument as dialogical encounter" as a marker of quality in PhD research. Drawing on the work of Hans Georg Gadamer the paper will explore the possibilities opened up by adopting the view of "argument as dialogical encounter" in the context of the PhD. In particular I consider the issue of how PhD projects be structured so as to support the construction of arguments appropriate to practice based research in design? Keywords: Argument; Gadamer; Hermeneutics; Rigour; Practice Based Research; Phd Examination Sally McLaughlin