<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Methodology</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 Sheffield Hallam University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_b</link>
<description>Recent Events in Methodology</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:27:23 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Investigative Designing: usage-oriented research in and through designing</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_b/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_b/3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In this paper, we discuss the practice of investigative designing. The notion is currently being used to denote a variety of ideas in design research, and we first seek to clarify some of them. We then present our own, specific take on this notion, while acknowledging that it is being used broadly. We adopted the notion as an umbrella term for our combined research and design activities: as investigative designers. We use it for the exploration of how designers can integrate designing and researching within a design process. The two main concerns we are pursuing within this are to clarify the role of a designer with research skills, and to explore the implications of a usage orientation in design. We present two studies in this paper in which we investigated how usage research for design can be specifically geared to the needs of design, and what helps designers (and what does not) in designing with usage information. In the first study, we ourselves conducted usage research, developed design ideas on the basis of that, and reflected on this process. In the second study, we observed how three other designers engaged with the same user data and developed design ideas. Our findings include that the designers tended to prefer to develop their own design ideas independently from the data, only checking or adapting the ideas to the data. Furthermore, the capacity of designers for dealing with data needs to be taken into consideration. Lastly, the form of data presentation influences how well designers can engage with it in designing.

Keywords: 
Investigative Design; Designing; Designer; Product Usage; User Research</description>

<author>Stella Boess</author>


</item>

<item>
<title>Beyond Dualisms in Methodology: An Integrative Design Research Medium &quot;MAPS&quot; and some Reflections</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_b/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_b/2</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Design research is an academic issue and increasingly an essential success factor for industrial, organizational and social innovation. The fierce rejection of 1st generation design methods in the early 1970s resulted in the postmodernist attitude of &#34;no methods&#34;, and subsequently, after more than a decade, in the strong adoption of scientific methods, or &#34;the&#34; scientific method, for design research. The current situation regarding methodology is characterized by unproductive dualisms such as scientific methods vs. designerly methods, normative methods vs. descriptive methods, research vs. design. The potential of the early (1st generation) methods is neglected and the practical usefulness of design research is impeded. The suggestion for 2nd generation methods as discussed by Rittel and others has hardly been taken up in design. The development of a methodological tool / medium for research through design - MAPS  - (which is the central part of the paper) presents the cause and catalyst for some reflections about the usability / desirability / usefulness of methodical support for the design (research) process.

Keywords:  
Integrative Design Research Medium, Research Through Design, MAPS, Methodology</description>

<author>Rosan Chow</author>


</item>

<item>
<title>Designing a Travel Guide to the Un-Natural World:  Exploring a Design-led Methodology</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_b/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.shu.ac.uk/drs2008/session10/track_b/1</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The analogy of designer as tourist in the un-natural world is used as an aid for thinking my way into the nature of design research. An exploration of how the design researcher, like a tourist, travels widely through the un-natural world of thought, theory and concept. If we are to design a travel guide for the un-natural world then what would this guide book look like, why do we need it and how could it work? The paper will propose that a 'travel guide to the un-natural world' in the form of a design-led methodology is needed for research into sustainable development and is useful not only for the design discipline but for the research community at large. These premises have been derived from the aptitude of the design process and the creative methods it employs to deal with the complex messiness of issues such as sustainability. Such a design-led methodology would be useful for the wider research community due to the integrative abilities of the design process and the trans-disciplinary scope of the tour through the un-natural world. Design-led methodology will be explored using examples from field work in Tumut (rural New South Wales, Australia)

Keywords: 
Design Research, Design-Led Methods, Metadesign, Sustainability.</description>

<author>Viveka Turnbull Hocking</author>


</item>


</channel>
</rss>